@ThisIsMissEm
@unpkg There is a limitiation in this summary
(https://www.ra-plutte.de/lg-muenchen-dynamische-einbindung-google-web-fonts-ist-dsgvo/)
... which could mean that if a third-party service has NO static variant, like
@unpkg, where the whole point is using dynamic access, websites might argue that
it's technically neccessary, and therefore allowed.
1 reply
@ThisIsMissEm
@unpkg In the ruling Google is also specifically
mentioned as having demonstrated interest in collecting user data. So
third-parties that e.g. are paid and have a zero tracking policy should be fine.